Inspiring Peace and Practicing Peace
Peacemaking really has a bad rap. Unlike the more abstract and unemotional terms like conflict resolution, conflict management, alternative dispute resolution, or mediation, peacemaking has levels and layers of meaning. Most people shy away from the word "peacemaking" because it sounds soft and impractical ("Blessed are the peacemakers"; "The meek shall inherit the earth", etc.). The truth is peacemaking is powerful, tough, and hard. As much as we might want to whitewash the deep hostilities in conflict with euphemisms like "conflict management," (very business school sounding and scientific too, don't you think?), those hostilities need to be confronted. How that confrontation occurs depends on the level of peacemaking one is engaged at.
Understanding the levels of peacemaking is therefore an important part of the peacemaking process. If we are engaged at the inspirational and exhortational level of peacemaking, we are expecting to create hope and motivation, but not real results. If we are bearing witness to injustice, as Gandhi did, we can create peace through appeals to higher values. If we are in the middle as mediators and peacemakers, we are inspiring, creating hope, appealing to higher values, while de-escalating, problem-solving teaching, coaching, cajoling, and crafting agreements that will withhold the inevitable future disputes. This section looks at various levels of peacemaking with the goal of demonstrating its complexity and richness in practice.